New Paper: Dessemination of project presentation (do a 5 slide Powerpoint) – Thi

WRITE MY ESSAY

New Paper: Dessemination of project presentation (do a 5 slide Powerpoint) – This is my 11th week being assigned to a medical surgical unit that has problems with Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection. I have been tasked with speaking with nurses and providers to work together with one goal and objective. With meetings, interdisciplinary meetings, campus wide quality meetings we are definitely on the road to reduction and the team is willing to continue this even after I leave. Nursing leadership is actively involved and device rounds for example is engrained on the unit. Please see the directions below as well as 2 past papers to give you background that you will use as a guide to complete the 5 slide powerpoint slide.
Starting in the first week of this course, you began the implementation process for your practice change. You have considered ethical and legal implications, managed barriers and pitfalls, collected data and evaluated results, and considered how to maintain the change. Now, you will disseminate the results to your practicum site and your colleagues in this course.
What is the best way to present your project? What do you need to include, what do you need to clarify, and what lessons did you learn? What do the results mean, and how did your leadership skills and style assist you throughout this process?
I have chosen a power point- I will narrate it . 5-6 references APA
For this Blog, you will have the opportunity to present your problem change project implementation to your colleagues. Consider how you can present your results, what to highlight, and what might need further exploration.
Post a five-slide, narrated presentation to present your project to your colleagues. You may select the technology to construct your presentation (VoiceThread, narrated PowerPoint, etc.); however, you must ensure the link can be easily viewed by your Instructor and peers.
Lessons Learned from Project Implementation and Evaluation
Reducing CAUTIs in health settings calls for multidisciplinary efforts that include teamwork, continuous education, and appropriate resource utilization. This work elaborates on the experience of the project aimed at reducing CAUTI in a medical-surgical unit, highlighting the need to maintain advanced efforts beyond the original intervention. The collaborative nature of the healthcare team, nurse managers, and nurses was the most critical factor in the success of SuccessFactors.
Lessons Learned from Project Implementation
The project’s first stage implied the selection of crucial obstacles with their further elimination through the corresponding strategies. Collaborative feedback identified shared dynamics within the medical-surgical unit that were conducive to functioning as a unified team guided by the project’s task. Although one began slightly adversely with the stroke of feelings with excessive responsibility, for instance, nursing staff, the team fairly swiftly adapted and managed considerable decreases in CAUTIs. Nevertheless, it soon became clear that constant mentoring and motion were required to keep these developments steady on a journey.
Identified Barriers and Strategies
1. Staff Resistance and Motivation
• Barrier: Staff members’ resistance to change can result from their comfort with their old habits or their lack of knowledge about the proposed system’s alternatives.
• Strategy: Continuous motivation is achieved through regular meetings, collaboration with nursing leadership, and recognition of compliance with guidelines, which enhances staff participation (Foster & Mazur, 2023).
2. Training and Education Gaps
• Barrier: Lack of staff training and understanding can prevent the implementation of new procedures, like Foley catheter use and notification protocols.
• Strategy: Continuous education programs addressing the lack of knowledge are necessary to ensure employee competency (Patel et al., 2023).
3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration
• Barrier: Building cooperation among the various healthcare practitioners is also not easy since they have busy schedules and diverse interests.
• Strategy: Building consistency and a supportive work environment whose goal is attained through collaborative initiatives promotes effective interdisciplinary collaboration and communication (Van Decker et al., 2021).
4. Resource Limitations
• Barrier: Resource constraints may make implementing these initiatives’ daily device rounds and compliance with new procedures difficult.
• Strategy: Efficient resource allocation and, if necessary, adjustments to staffing strategies or technological equipment can help solve the problem of limitations and ensure an efficient flow of work (Werneburg, 2022).
5. Monitoring and Feedback
• Barrier: It is not easy to set up effective processes for monitoring the progress, which could provide feedback simultaneously.
• Strategy: Continuous improvement is more accessible with reliable tracking systems like digital tools or the support of Gantt charts and regular feedback sessions (Musco et al., 2022).
Role of Nurse Manager and Nursing Staff
As this project approaches the final stages, the nurse manager’s continued function and the nursing staff’s effectiveness as stakeholders and project managers must be considered critical. Their leadership and commitment are crucial for maintaining momentum and promoting the continuation of successful activities even after the conclusion of the intervention. The collaborative and inclusive environment in the unit establishes them as leaders who can steer the team to any improvement initiatives and continuous efforts.
Sustainable Strategies for Future Directions
1. Leadership Engagement
• Sustained leadership of registered nurses is critical for the required escalation in motivation and momentum. Recognition Employee recognition, regular feedback sessions, and recognition for achievements lead to sustaining engagement (Patel et al., 2023).
2. Education and Training
• Education and training must continue to address the high risk of emerging challenges so that the staff understands change and the use of new procedures well (Agado, 2020).
3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration
• An environment of open communication and shared objectives ensures sustained collaboration among all stakeholders, supporting a harmonized approach to CAUTI prevention (Van Decker et al., 2021).
4. Resource Management
• Resource needs should be assessed regularly, and adjustments should be made to personnel strategies to address a changing environment and improve resource use (Werneburg, 2022).
5. Monitoring and Feedback Mechanisms
• Establishing effective tracking systems and feedback mechanisms ensures continuous monitoring and accountability, allowing the progress in preventing CAUTI to be constantly assessed and improved (Musco et al., 2022).
In summary, the long-term success in reducing CAUTIs in the medical-surgical unit will depend on an integrated application of all-around teamwork, continuous education, and efficient resource utilization. The project’s lessons reveal the need to act on limitations and adopt sustainable notions. Through the partnership of the team culture and the leadership of the nurse manager and nursing staff, the medical-surgical unit can further improve patient safety and quality of care while lowering the occurrence of CAUTIs.
References
Agado, B. (2020). Reducing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Project. https://soar.usa.edu/scholprojects/15/
Foster, M., & Mazur, L. (2023). Impact of leadership walkarounds on operational, cultural and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. BMJ Open Quality, 12(4), e002284.
Musco, S., Giammò, A., Savoca, F., Gemma, L., Geretto, P., Soligo, M., … & Li Marzi, V. (2022). How to Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: A Reappraisal of Vico’s Theory—Is History Repeating Itself? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(12), 3415. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/12/3415
Patel, P. K., Advani, S. D., Kofman, A. D., Lo, E., Maragakis, L. L., Pegues, D. A., … & Meddings, J. (2023). Strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 44(8), 1209-1231 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology/article/strategies-to-prevent-catheterassociated-urinary-tract-infections-in-acutecare-hospitals-2022-update/7A56FE9DABD0A9C670D728AD16F9FC48
Van Decker, S. G., Bosch, N., & Murphy, J. (2021). Catheter-associated urinary tract infection reduction in critical care units: a bundled care model. BMJ open quality, 10(4). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8705224/
Werneburg, G. T. (2022). Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: current challenges and prospects. Research and Reports in Urology, 109-133. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2147/RRU.S273663
Medical surgical units are confronted with a critical challenge in the form of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs), thus leading to an incision that is aimed at developing essential strategies for data collection and analysis on mitigation. The current paper focuses on the holistic approach to data collecting, analyzes the scorecard’s performance, and discusses various dashboard management tactics used in the CAUTI elimination project. The project has been able to reduce the initial 20 cases down to a two-case count.
Therefore, an effective data collection and analysis plan is essential for decision-making processes that are informed to improve healthcare efforts. (Atkins et al., 2020). It is one of the most important factors in understanding dynamics and proper intervention after the problem. The various stages of this project indicate that there are numerous challenges involved due to several factors namely collaboration issues, Lenovo nursing staff integration, and communication barriers depicting the complexity of a healthcare environment (Robinson et al., 2021). To address these difficulties, an intelligent and dynamic data-gathering approach that encompasses both numerical indicators and qualitative feedback is required.
The procedural changes such as minimization of unnecessary Foley catheter insertions, the use of external catheters and reinforced through a process known to be holistic (Meddings et al., 2030). Such a method involves a data-collection plan which addresses both quantitative parameters such as infection rates and qualitative processes like patterns of team cooperation.
Organized Data Collection:
Data collection was a vital part of defining the interventions necessary to guide CAUTI reduction program.First of all, there were 20 CAUTIs that required the targeted interventions. Active role-wise, it included being there 3 to 4 days a week with charge nurses and conducting device rounds on all foleys while also taking part in multidisciplinary meetings. Decision-making and intervention strategies were based on the collected data.
Baseline Assessment:
• Initial CAUTI count was recorded at 20.
• Identified challenges included a lack of collaboration between providers and nurses, new nursing staff, and communication barriers with physicians.
Implementation Strategies:
• Strategies included reducing unnecessary Foley catheter insertions, utilizing external catheters when needed, and ensuring proper maintenance.
• Regular communication with the multidisciplinary team, and charge nurses, and participation in campus-wide CAUTI meetings were prioritized.
Ongoing Monitoring:
• A presence of 3-4 days a week allowed for continuous monitoring.
• Device rounds on all Foley catheters were conducted to ensure adherence to best practices.
Root Cause Analysis (RCA):
• Participation in RCA for all CAUTI cases provided insights for continuous improvement.
The summarized data in the table provides a snapshot of the interventions, outcomes, and success in reducing CAUTIs for two selected patients.
Patient ID Initial CAUTI Status Intervention Outcome
001 Positive Foley reduction, External catheter utilization Negative (Post-Intervention)
002 Positive Frequent Foley Maintenance, Device Rounds Negative (Post-Intervention)
Data Analysis: The analysis phase is focused on the assessment of the effectiveness of the implemented strategies and their influence on the CAUTI rates. The data were collected and analyzed to evaluate interventions effectiveness. The reduction of unnecessary Foley catheter insertions and the implementation of external catheters led to a marked decrease in CAUTI cases. The scorecard, which was constantly improved as per data insights, stayed within the scope of project objectives. The project was a success because effective dashboard management enabled the free flow of information and real-time decision-making
Reduction in CAUTI Cases:
• The interventions led to a decrease from 20 to 2 CAUTI cases.
• Two other cases had special situations (long-term care facility transfer and extended hospital stay)
Time Point CAUTI Count Interventions Outcome:
Time Point CAUTI Count Interventions Outcome
Baseline Assessment 20 – –
During Implementation – Reduced Foley insertions, enhanced communication CAUTI count decreased
Post-Implementation 2 Ongoing monitoring, RCA participation Further reduction
• During Implementation – Reduced Foley insertions, enhanced communication CAUTI count decreased
• Post-Implementation 2 Ongoing monitoring, RCA participation Further reduction
Scorecard Assessment: The success of the CAUTI reduction project is dependent on the proper working of the scorecard used to determine its results. A functional scorecard should cover the most important metrics that directly correspond to the goals and objectives of the initiative. Abdelmoaty et al. (2022), in the context of healthcare improvement, point out the need to match metrics with the objectives of the project. One critical indicator is the decrease in unwarranted Foley catheter insertions. Jain et al. (2020) argue that a focused strategy of reducing the use of catheters is the basis of reducing the incidence of CAUTIs. The scorecard should represent the percentage of reduction and the impact of such reduction on infection rates. Moreover, the use of external catheters as required is another measure that needs to be incorporated into the scorecard in great detail. Coordinated strategies should be emphasized by Gupta et al. (2023), and the scorecard should reflect the effective implementation of such strategies in reducing healthcare-associated infections.
Dashboard Management: The right management of the dashboard assures accurate transformation from data to actionable information that eases communication among the members hockey team. Instantaneous dynamic updates on the dashboard make it possible for timely responses related to emerging trends or challenges. In elucidating the dashboard’s management within the CAUTI reduction project, the incorporation of knowledge from various perspectives becomes critical.
The way the dashboard is used depends on various stakeholders including charge nurses, physicians as well and other members. Frequent team meetings, such as those introduced in the CAUTI reduction practice, increase transparency and promote collaborative decision-making (Yu et al., 202 The dashboard is used as a visual aid in these meetings and gives an overview of the main metrics and project status.
Dashboard management, therefore should be responsive to the dynamic nature of healthcare. The study by Schwartz et al. (2021) focuses on the importance of adapting health policies to treat emerging infections within healthcare facilities This principle can be carried out in CAUTI reduction project by making sure that the dashboard represents changes occurring in best practices and guidelines for catheter care.
Conclusion: In summary, the CAUTI reduction project has shown a remarkable improvement in reducing cases of infections within this unit. The success in this aspect could be accredited to the comprehensive data collection and analysis plan, a fully functioning scorecard development as well as effective dashboard management. The continuous assessment and adjustments based on information insights from credible sources ensure the constant effectiveness of a project, reflecting particular characteristics inherent to healthcare settings. It would, therefore, help healthcare providers understand that the nature of patient care is fluid and necessitates flexibility strategies. Combined with regular policy reviews, the integration of insights originating from a variety of sources helps enrich initiatives aimed at making patient outcomes effective and resilient. The CAUTI Reduction project is a living example of how data-driven collaborative efforts have the potential to transform healthcare improvement.
References
Abdelmoaty et al. (2022). Improving nurses’ knowledge about prevention of catheter-acquired urinary tract infections in intensive care units. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 27 (10), 638–642.
Atkins, L., Sallis, A., Chadborn, T., Shaw, K., Schneider, A., Hopkins, S., … & Lorencatto, F. (2020). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioral analysis of interventions. Implementation Science, 15, 1-22.
Gupta et al. (2023). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the cardiac intensive care unit with a coordinated strategy and nursing staff empowerment. BMJ, 12 (2), 1-7.
Jain, H., Hartigan, E., Tschopp, J., Suits, P., & Paolino, K. (2020). Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs) Reduction: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 41(S1), s154-s154.
Meddings, J., Rogers, M. A., Krein, S. L., Fakih, M. G., Olmsted, R. N., & Saint, S. (2013). Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ quality & and safety.
Robinson, K. N. (2021). Strategies to Decrease Cauti Rates in Hospitalized Patients: An Integrative Review.
Schwartz, D. B., Barrocas, A., Annetta, M. G., Stratton, K., McGinnis, C., Hardy, G., … & ASPEN International Clinical Ethics Position Paper Update Workgroup. (2021). Ethical aspects of artificially administered nutrition and hydration: an ASPEN position paper. Nutrition in clinical practice, 36(2), 254-267.
Yu, S., Marshall, A. P., Li, J., & Lin, F. (2020). Interventions and strategies to prevent catheter‐associated urinary tract infections with short‐term indwelling urinary catheters in hospitalized patients: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 26(3), e12834.

WRITE MY ESSAY